Friday, November 8, 2013
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
What I Wore Today
Hey muffins! Out of sheer boredom I hopped on YouTube and decided to tackle a eyeshadow tutorial. I did a pink smokey eye yesterday so I tried it again today. Uhhhh, yeah that ish BANGS. And my brows decided to cooperate as well, much obliged *bows* Nothing too fancy today ladies & gents, just a long tunic i sliced up and some shorty shorts. Pigtails sold separately. I have a ton of writing, YouTube planning, and beauty reviews to bang out so I'll talk to you soon!
*mwuah*
 |
| Long hair..... :) |
 |
| Off with her head! |
 |
| Stank face |
 |
| *gasp!* Check the finger piece tho. |
Saturday, June 22, 2013
CelebriTea: Dolce & Gabbana
Prosecutors alleged that the sale was made in an attempt to avoid declaring taxes on royalties deriving from the two brands' activities. Under Italian law, the pair wouldn't go to prison because sentences of less than three years are served with house arrest or community service. And the designers have the right to appeal the verdict twice, and Italian courts often take years to reach a final decision. Corporate tax rates in Luxembourg are close to zero, while Italy the rate is a hefty 28%. We see what you did there fellas *side eye*
While this may be one of the most high-profile cases pursued by Italian tax authorities, Dolce & Gabbana is not the only fashion group to have been in the hot seat. In 1996, Giorgio Armani received a nine-month suspended sentence and was fined $64,000 for paying off tax authorities in exchange for favorable audits. Armani later admitted that he had, in fact, paid those bribes. So with all this hoopla can a weary-eyed, shopaholic soul like myself hope for a downward spiral in D&G apparel prices? No? Well, one can hope. If jail time was awarded I would tell the unbelievably posh couple to be strong and don't drop the soap, but we know how they roll.
Saturday, May 11, 2013
No, no little Kimmy
Anna Wintour is not having it. When Kimmy Cakes was rolled into her Met Gallery Anna said "Oh no ma'am!". Ye reportedly begged the 63 year-old editor-in-chief to allow Kim to attend, and this trollop shows up in a sofa slip cover. Honey Anna said not in my house! While Ye made the event's Best Dressed list, Kim did not. In fact, Vogue went so far as to crop her out of Ye's photo that made the list. Now I know good and well there were plenty of photos of Kanye sans Kim. But they chose to crop her out the picture? Ouch!
Its no secret in the fashion world that Anna Wintour has no time for the Kardashian clan. Reports also say that Kim had been banned from previous Met Balls, a call orchestrated by Wintour herself. But since Kanye was performing at the event, and he has a plus one, his babymama was the obvious choice. Did she really have to wear the curtains though?
"Anna hates Kim. Why would she be invited to the event? It is all the biggest stars in the world and Kim doesn’t fit that bill at all."The Met Gala is $25,000 a ticket, but Kim can’t even buy her way in, Anna Wintour does NOT want her there!"Anna Wintour would allow Kim Kardashian on the cover of Vogue over her dead body. As long as Anna in charge you will NOT see Kim on Vogue."
This is what a source told Radar last year. So if Kim's entire existence was reduced to an ever present floral shadow and a few chopped off fingers was a result of her fugly dress, or because Anna Wintour despises her, its still a diss. And if Anna actively banned Kim from the Met Ball and Vogue in the past, this is nothing new.
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
